School of Health Professions - Student Handbook 2019 - 2020


Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology

SLP Program


Accreditation
The Master of Science in speech-language pathology program at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center is accredited by the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2200 Research Boulevard #310, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 800-498-2071 or 301-296-5700.


Speech-Language Pathology Program Mission Statement
The mission of the Program in Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) is to improve the communication skills of people by offering students the academic, research, and clinical foundations needed to provide evidence-based clinical services to diverse populations, utilizing current best practices.

Speech-Language Pathology Program Strategic Plan

Goal 1: Increase the national visibility of our program
Specific Steps:
Maintain 100% passing rate for the national certification examination.
Increase the ranking of the program by third parties (e.g., US News and World Report.)
Increase support for SLP graduate students who participate in research (e.g., providing travel funds to present research at state-level professional conferences; increasing grant funding for research assistants.)
Offer unique educational opportunities (e.g., interprofessional coursework and clinical experiences working with students from other disciplines; bilingual clinical practica.)

Goal 2: Meet programmatic (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Council on Academic Accreditation) and regional (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools) accreditation standards and ensure that graduates meet current standards for national certification (ASHA Council for Clinical Certification) and Texas licensure
Specific Steps:
Regularly revise didactic and clinical curricula to meet standards for programmatic accreditation.
Include emerging technologies in coursework and clinical practica and provide clinical experiences with linguistically and culturally diverse populations.
Require students to demonstrate oral and written communication skills sufficient for effective interaction with other professionals and clients/patients and their families.
Provide opportunities for students to critically evaluate research and utilize the principles of the scientific method in advanced studies and evidenced-based clinical practice.
Ensure that 100% of graduates meet the coursework and practicum requirements for ASHA CCC and Texas licensure.

Goal 3: Remain the School of Choice for the most talented students in Texas and for outstanding out-of-state students.

Specific steps:
Increase the number and proportion of our faculty whose work is published and/or presented in national or international venues.
Provide graduate assistantships to 30% of each cohort; increase competitive scholarships to support out-of-state students.
Increase the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of ethnic minority students.
Increase grants and clinical contract revenue to supplement institutional funding for equipment, clinical materials, technology, and other program needs.

Speech-Language Pathology Learning Outcomes (graduate)
Upon completion of the speech-language pathology graduate program, students will be able to: (examples of possible assignments the students will complete to accomplish the Learning Outcome)
Integrate research principles and processes into evidence-based clinical practice
(Conduct a literature search on a topic related to evidence-based practice.  Obtain and review at least 7 research articles related to topic.)
Select, administer, and interpret assessment measures appropriate to various types of communication disorders and differences
(Develop, administer, and interpret a voice assessment on a person at-risk for a voice disorder. Administer, score, and interpret at least one formal adult language assessment procedure.)
Apply knowledge of basic human communication and swallowing processes to the evaluation of possible disorders and differences
(Transcribe both normal and disordered speech, using narrow transcription.  Label normal oropharyngeal anatomy on a lateral x-ray.)
Use assessment data to develop differential diagnoses, prognostic statements, and recommendations
(Complete an assignment related to the use, management, and troubleshooting of hearing aids and FM systems for individuals with hearing loss.  Determine individuals’ candidacy for intervention and write prognostic statements for improvement of communicative function.)
Develop and implement culturally sensitive, age-appropriate intervention plans to be implemented in health care and educational delivery systems
(Write a report evaluating a published fluency therapy plan.  Write a treatment plan and/or discharge summary that is age-appropriate and culturally sensitive for a virtual adult patient with an acquired language disorder in a health care system.)
Provide effective counseling/education to clients/patients, caregivers, and other professionals
(Develop materials related to typical or disordered speech production, appropriate for caregivers or other service providers. Participate in clinical experiences which include successful counseling of individuals with a communication disorder.)
Identify risk factors and recommend prevention strategies
(Maintain a weekly vocal hygiene journal, documenting vocal abuses/misuses and associated strategies to improve vocal health.  Identify risk factors associated with dysphagia and/or aspiration pneumonia and recommend strategies to prevent secondary complications.)
Use professional writing skills to document assessment and treatment procedures and results
(Complete a medical chart entry (SOAP note) based on a speech-language therapy session for a virtual adult patient with an acquired language disorder.  Write appropriate and measurable goals for a virtual patient with a motor speech disorder.)
Apply standards of ethical conduct and professional behavior to clinical practice
(Write a brief summary following a class discussion during which an ethical dilemma was the topic and present it to the instructor one week after the discussion. Summarize the ethical issues involved in conducting and reporting research.)
Identify the impact of regulatory, legislative, and credentialing issues on service delivery (Write an essay related to an assigned regulatory or legislative issue. Identify reimbursement and regulatory issues affecting the provision of AAC services.)

Speech-Language Pathology Program Essential Functions/Technical Standards
The accredited programs of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology in the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences (SLHS) adhere to the standards set by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), including a code of ethics https://www.asha.org/policy/ET2016-00342/. Faculty members have a responsibility for the welfare of clients/patients tested, treated, or otherwise affected by students enrolled in the SLHS programs. Thus, it is important that individuals admitted, retained, and graduated possess the intelligence, integrity, compassion, humanitarian concern, and physical and emotional capacity necessary to practice audiology and speech-language pathology.
In order to fulfill this responsibility, the department of SLHS has established a document of technical standards that reflects the functions that are considered essential to the professions of audiology and speech-language pathology. Ability to meet these technical standards is required for admission to the graduate programs and must be maintained throughout the time a student is enrolled in the program. Admission and retention decisions are based not only on satisfactory academic standing but also on non-academic factors that serve to ensure that candidates can meet the technical standards of the clinical programs required for graduation. Due to changes in healthcare and/or professional scope of practice, these technical standards may be amended over time and are subject to change.  Students will be notified of any changes to these standards.
The department of SLHS seeks to educate a qualified, diverse group of students recognizing that in diversity lies excellence. The department is committed to the education of all qualified individuals, including persons with disabilities who, with or without reasonable accommodation, are capable of performing the technical standards outlined below. In keeping with applicable federal and state law regarding disabilities, the department is committed to making reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities to enable them to perform successfully. A reasonable accommodation should not fundamentally alter the academic and clinical requirements of the programs, pose a direct threat to the health or safety of the student or others, or present an undue burden to the institution. Any student with a disability who is accepted to either of the graduate programs must contact the 504 coordinator in the TTUHSC Office of Student Services as soon as possible. The 504 coordinator will confirm that the stated condition qualifies as a disability under applicable laws and will work with the department to determine what accommodations are reasonable.
In order to acquire the knowledge and skills requisite to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology to function in a variety of clinical situations and to successfully complete the programs at TTUHSC, candidates for degrees must have multiple abilities and skills divided into five areas: communication, motor, intellectual-cognitive, sensory-observational, and social-behavioral. The following technical standards reflect the applicable sub-set of abilities that are required under each skill:
1. Communication
Prospective and current students must possess adequate communication skills to:
  • Communicate effectively with individuals and groups in person, by phone, and in written form while considering the communication needs and cultural values of the listener at a level which will support competent professional practice.
  • Communicate proficiently in oral and written English.
  • Communicate professionally, effectively, and legibly to meet demands required as part of coursework and during clinical work to ensure patient safety (e.g., scholarly papers, medical records, clinical reports, standardized assessment).
  • Perceive and demonstrate appropriate non-verbal communication for culture and context.
  • Convey information accurately with relevance and cultural sensitivity.
  • Possess sufficient speech/vocal productions for provision of clinical services.
2. Motor skills
Prospective and current students must possess adequate motor skills to:
  • Sustain necessary physical activity level in required classroom and clinical activities for the defined workday.
  • Efficiently manipulate testing and treatment environments, materials, and equipment to complete screening and evaluation protocols and treatment and behavior plans.
  • Access technology and equipment for clinical management (e.g., billing, charting, therapy programs), diagnostic testing, and treatment protocols.
  • Negotiate patient/client care environments and move between settings such as the classroom, health care facility, educational setting, and community settings.
  • Access transportation to attend academic courses and clinical placements.
  • Use fine motor skills to perform procedure involving the outer ear and speech mechanisms (e.g., ear canal impressions, otoscopy, hearing aid fittings, oral mechanism exams, swallowing protocols).
  • Safely manipulate patient-utilized equipment (e.g., durable medical equipment to include AAC devices, hearing aids).
  • Provide a safe environment for others when responding to emergency situations (e.g., fire, choking, or other medical emergencies) and in the application of universal precautions.
3. Intellectual/Cognitive
Prospective and current students must possess adequate intellectual/cognitive skills to:
  • Comprehend, retain, integrate, synthesize, infer, evaluate, and apply large amounts of written and verbal information in a short period of time sufficiently to meet curricular and clinical demands.
  • Read, comprehend, record, and interpret information accurately from diagnostic tests, equipment, and patient records to formulate a diagnosis, develop a treatment plan, make independent clinical decisions, and ensure patient safety.
  • Generate discipline-specific documents and clinical reports in English.
  • Seek relevant case information, synthesize, and apply concepts and information from various sources and disciplines.
  • Analyze and solve problems, reason, and make sound clinical judgments in patient assessment, diagnostic, and therapeutic planning and implementation. 
  • Accurately identify and communicate limits in one’s own professional knowledge and skills and utilize resources to increase knowledge and skills.
  • Use technology to meet requirements of courses and practicum (e.g., internet access, learning management systems, electronic health records).
4. Sensory/Observation
Prospective and current students must possess adequate sensory skills of vision, hearing, touch, and smell to:
  • Visually and auditorily identify normal and disordered characteristics in the areas of semantics, pragmatics, syntax, morphology, phonology, swallowing, cognition, balance, hearing, and social interaction related to communication.
  • Observe patients’ activity and behavior accurately during assessment and treatment procedures.
  • Visually monitor client/patient responses and materials.
  • Identify and discriminate anatomic structures and imaging findings (e.g., otoscopy, oral mechanism exam, MBSS, FEES).
  • Discriminate text, numbers, tables, and graphs associated with diagnostic instruments and tests.
  • Accurately monitor, through both visual and auditory modalities, materials and equipment used for assessment and treatment of patients.
  • Recognize and interpret when a client’s family/caregiver does or does not understand the clinician’s written and/or verbal communication.
5. Social/Behavioral skills
Prospective and current students must possess adequate social/behavioral skills to:
  • Comply with administrative, legal, and regulatory policies, including upholding the ASHA Code of Ethics.
  • Demonstrate respect for individual, social, and cultural differences in fellow students, faculty, staff, patients, and patients’ families during clinical and academic interactions.
  • Maintain adequate physical and mental health and self-care such that the health and safety of self and others in the academic and clinical settings is not jeopardized.
  • Maintain adequate physical and mental health and self-care to access and participate in a variety of educational and clinical settings/activities.
  • Develop and maintain professional relationships with clients/patients, fellow students, and colleagues.
  • Demonstrate flexibility and the ability to adapt to changing situations and uncertainty (which includes maintaining professional demeanor and emotional health) in academic, clinical, and community settings.
  • Conduct oneself in a mature, empathetic, and effective professional manner by exhibiting compassion, honesty, integrity, professionalism, and concern for others in an ethical and legal manner in all interactions and situations.
  • Maintain regular attendance and meet responsibilities within designated timelines.
  • Manage time effectively to complete professional and technical tasks within constraints.
  • Accept feedback (e.g., suggestions, constructive criticism) and modify behavior accordingly.
  • Maintain appropriate and professional appearance for varied clinical and academic environments.

Academic Standards for SLP Students
Every student enrolled in the graduate program in speech-language pathology is required to maintain a high level of performance and to comply fully with the policies of the program and the institution. Failure to do so will lead to academic probation and ultimately to dismissal from the program. Students who are not meeting academic standards in any course will receive a letter from the Program Director during the semester. Copies of all warning letters will be placed in the student’s file.
To remain in good academic standing, graduate students in speech-language pathology must maintain a 3.0 semester GPA.

Grades Below C
Only courses completed with a grade of C or above are acceptable for degree requirements, certification, and licensure.  Students who earn a grade of D, F, or NC in a course will be eligible to repeat the course one time, during the next course rotation. Repeating the course does not replace the original grade.  For the purpose of calculating GPA, the grade obtained when a course is retaken is averaged with previous grades.


Academic Counseling Criteria
Each term, the faculty will review students' performance at mid-semester.  If there are concerns about a student’s academic or clinical work, the student will receive a letter from the Program Director, instructing him or her to meet with the instructor(s) and Program Director to discuss the concerns and to determine what measures the student needs to take to return to good academic standing.  Copies of all warning letters will be placed in the student’s file.


Academic Performance Policies
To remain in good academic standing, graduate students in speech-language pathology must maintain a 3.0 semester GPA.

Academic Probation
A graduate student may be placed on academic probation for one or more of the following:
  • failing to maintain a semester graduate GPA of 3.0.
  • earning a grade of D, F, “fail”, or “no credit” in any course
  • failing to complete an individualized student support plan when required to remediate Learning Outcomes.
Graduate credit will be allowed for a course with a grade of C, but the experience cannot be used to satisfy departmental clock hour minimums and competencies for the KASA.
Academic Probation and Externships
A student who is on academic probation or receives two or more course midterm warnings for poor academic performance may not be assigned an externship placement for the upcoming semester until a GPA of 3.0 or better has been attained.  This may delay the start of the clinical externship and may result in a placement other than the student’s requested site.  Also, the Director of Clinical Education will not develop new affiliation agreements for students who are not in good academic standing.  If/When the student returns to good academic standing, his/her externship placement will be at a facility with an existing affiliation agreement.
Repeating a course: Courses completed with a grade of D or below will not meet graduation requirements. Students who earn a D or F in a course will have one opportunity to repeat the course, during the next course rotation.  Failure to earn a C or better when the course is repeated will result in dismissal from the program. A student will not be allowed to graduate until all courses have been completed with a grade of C or above.  Any clinical enrollment completed with a D or F (including “fail” or “no credit”) will result in loss of all clinical hours obtained during the semester and will not count toward departmental clock hour minimums.
Repeating a course does not replace the original grade. For the purpose of calculating GPA, the grade obtained when a course is retaken is averaged with previous grades.
Students on academic probation will not be allowed to participate in a clinical externship until they return to good academic standing.  To return to good academic standing, the student must earn a semester GPA of at least 3.0 in the semester following probation.
Students may be placed on academic probation for a maximum of two semesters during their graduate program.   Meeting the conditions for academic probation a third time will result in dismissal from the program.
As per the SHP policy on Academic Probation, students will be notified that they are being placed on academic probation via a letter from the Program Director. Copies of the letter will be provided to the student, the Program Director, the Department Chair, and the Director of the Office of Admissions and Student affairs. (Policies of the School of Health Professions can be accessed through the following URL: https://hscweb.ttuhsc.edu/health-professions/current/policies.aspx)
Remediation
An array of remediation options may be recommended for students placed on academic probation.Options for remediation as determined by the Program Director, in consultation with appropriate faculty, may include but are not limited to:
  • Individual tutoring with a program faculty member.
  • Individual tutoring with a student who is performing well in the program.
  • Auditing courses.
  • Repeating courses or clinical experiences.
  • Participating in faculty-directed group or individual study.
  • Preparing a research paper or project.
  • Completing reading assignments pertinent to areas needing remediation.
All meetings with the student regarding remediation must be documented, to include the student’s understanding of the problem and willingness to comply with the plan.  Routine follow-up counseling with the student is scheduled to assess and document the student’s progress and the outcome of the remediation plan.  The student should be aware that some remediation plans can delay projected graduation.
Dismissal
A graduate student will be dismissed from the program for one or more of the following:
  • violating the academic and/or non-academic misconduct policies of the School of Health Professions.
  • failing to achieve a semester GPA of 3.0 while on academic probation.
  • failing to earn a grade of C or better when repeating a course in which the student previously earned a grade of D or F.
  • failing to successfully complete remediation as established by the program.
  • meeting the conditions of academic probation for a third semester.
  • failing comprehensive examination remediation
A graduate student whose semester GPA falls below 2.75 in the final semester of the program will be ineligible for graduation.
As per the SHP policy on Academic Dismissal, students will receive an “intent to dismiss” letter generated by the Office of Admissions and Student Affairs and signed by the Department Chair.This letter will provide information about the student’s right to appeal the dismissal.Copies of the letter will be provided to the student, the Program Director, the Department Chair, and the Director of the Office of Admissions and Student Affairs.
(Policies of the School of Health Professions can be accessed through the following URL: https://hscweb.ttuhsc.edu/health-professions/current/policies.aspx)


Knowledge and Skills Acquisition/Learning Outcomes
In addition to satisfactory completion of coursework and clinical practica, students must demonstrate knowledge and skills necessary for entry-level, independent practice of speech-language pathology as specified in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Standards for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology.  The program has developed 10 broad learning outcomes, tied to the larger Knowledge and Skills Acquisition document.  Selected learning outcomes are addressed in every didactic course and clinical practicum, and the instructor determines how those learning outcomes are measured. It is possible for a student to earn a grade of A or B in a course, yet not demonstrate one or more learning outcomes at a satisfactory level.  (If a student earns a grade of C or lower for a course, remediation or learning outcomes is automatically required.)
Remediation of learning outcomes. If a student does not meet one or more learning outcomes of a course, the instructor will work with the student to develop a plan outlining the steps for acquiring the lacking knowledge and skills. The plan must include requirements to receive credit for the learning outcome(s), along with a date of completion. Completion dates must be before mid-term of the semester following the course enrollment. Failure to successfully complete the requirements as established will result in the student being referred for an individualized student support plan. Support plans may include the requirement to enroll in additional coursework. Failure to complete the support plan in a timely manner may delay graduation and ultimately may result in dismissal from the program.
The program director will provide students with regular feedback regarding progress toward the degree and toward acquisition of the required knowledge and skills through Plan of Study meetings and individual counseling as needed.

Withdrawal from Program
A student who wishes to withdraw from the SLP program must schedule an appointment with the Program Director, who will provide guidance on the withdrawal process.



Expectations of Graduate Students in the Speech-Language Pathology Program

Clinical Practica
As students advance through the program, they will assume greater responsibilities as clinicians.  Below is a summary of some of the major responsibilities.
  1. Maintain a realistic daily schedule which allows sufficient time to manage patient assignments.
  2. Determine if your clinic assignments are sufficient to meet your clinical clock hour requirements.
  3. Schedule patients during regular operating hours subsequent to obtaining the supervisor’s permission.
  4. Maintain all clinical fees, hours, and records as specified in the clinic handbook.
  5. Attend all clinic meetings, supervisory appointments, and other professional activities (e.g., staffings and extracurricular departmental presentations).
  6.  Secure all equipment, files, tests, rooms, and buildings used.
  7. Fulfill all assignments issued by a Clinical Director.
  8. Solicit constructive criticism from the clinical educator(s).
  9. Incorporate constructive criticism provided by the clinical educator(s)
  10. Behave in a professional manner when interacting with clinical educators, patients, other professionals, and caregivers (e.g., parents).
  11. Obtain formal permission from the supervisor(s) prior to implementation of any communication with a patient or his or her caregiver(s) or the initiation of any clinical management (e.g., therapy, referral, dismissal from therapy, cancellation of a scheduled clinical session, assessment results and/or recommendations, etc.)

Certification and Licensure
Students who complete the graduate program in speech-language pathology will meet the academic and clinical requirements for certification by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and Texas licensure.  The Program Director verifies satisfactory completion of both undergraduate and graduate academic course work, clinical practicum, and knowledge and skills requirements.  The salient features of the standards for the ASHA Certificate of Clinical Competence include:
  • Completion of required coursework culminating in a graduate degree from a program accredited by the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
  • Skills in oral and written communication and demonstrated knowledge of ethical standards, research principles, and current professional and regulatory issues.
  • Practicum experiences that encompass the breadth of the current scope of practice with both adults and children resulting in a minimum of 400 clock hours of supervised practicum (at least 375 at the graduate level).
  • A clinical fellowship completed under the direction of a mentoring speech-language pathologist who holds a current Certificate of Clinical Competence.
Prior to graduation, students must demonstrate, through completion of the Knowledge and Skills Acquisition (KASA) form with supporting documentation, the ability to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information pertaining to normal and abnormal human communication across the life span, including the effect of cultural and linguistic diversity.  Similar knowledge must be demonstrated for swallowing and emerging areas of practice.  Examples of acceptable documentation to support the KASA include class projects, clinical experiences, independent studies, checklists of skills, records of progress in clinical skill development, research projects, course modules, and workshops.


Failure to Meet KASA Standards
Students not meeting departmental requirements for acquisition of knowledge and skills must complete remediation plans as defined by the program director in conjunction with the Director of Clinical Education, departmental faculty members, and/or clinical educators.  Failure to complete the remediation plan will result in dismissal from the program.



Master of Science Degree in Speech-Language Pathology
Comprehensive Examination Policy


Final Examination Definition
The final examination shall consist of the satisfactory completion of a master's thesis or a comprehensive examination.  Students who select the comprehensive examination option must achieve passing scores on all portions of the exam to be eligible for graduation.

Nature of the Comprehensive Examination
Candidates taking the comprehensive final examination will respond to questions on two or three consecutive days (schedule determined annually).  Many of the questions will be integrative and will require students to draw on their knowledge of normal development as well as disorders, and address issues such as the philosophies and theories supporting assessment and treatment.  Students should be prepared to answer questions related to all areas of the KASA and related topics such as legislation, ethics, and other professional issues. Some objective questions requiring factual knowledge will be included, but the main purpose of this exam is to determine if the candidate can synthesize information for problem-solving tasks.


Administration
The examination will be administered each year during the spring semester.  Candidates will write for up to 12 hours distributed across two to three days (schedule determined on an annual basis).  All answers will be handwritten.  The department will provide Scantrons, blue books, or other test forms.  A faculty proctor will supply all the day’s questions at the beginning of the day.  Students may take breaks from writing as needed.


Question Preparation and Selection
The Comprehensive Examination Committee Chairperson (CECC) will solicit questions from faculty responsible for graduate curricula in the major and minor content areas. The CECC will ask for questions 6 weeks prior to the exam.  Faculty questions will be submitted to the CECC by 3 weeks prior to the exam.


Examination Grading
The faculty member supplying questions for a content area will grade the candidate's reply. The CECC may also ask one other faculty member in the respective area (major or minor) to evaluate the student responses. 
To obtain an overall passing grade for the comprehensive examination, the candidate must achieve a score of 70% or better for each content area on the comprehensive examination.  A student with an average score of 92% or above will be designated passing with honorsIn the event that a passing score is not achieved:
1.  Students who initially fail a section of the exam typically will be required to re-take that portion of the exam (with different questions on the same topic area), or complete a project designed by the course instructor. 
2.  Students who fail 40% or more of the comprehensive exam subject areas will be required to enroll in an independent study course in the summer following administration of the exam, and then retake the sections of the exam which they failed initially.
3.  For students who fail re-examination, an individualized remediation program will be developed by a committee. Upon successful completion of the remedial activity, the student will be cleared for the graduation if all other requirements are met.
4.  If the student fails to successfully complete the individualized remediation program, the student will be dismissed from the program without graduation or conferral of the degree.

Timing of Comprehensive Examination and Current Coursework
Because the comprehensive examination will be completed prior to final course examinations, many students will take the comprehensive examination while enrolled in one or more courses during that same semester.  Satisfactory completion of both the comprehensive examination and the coursework is required for the Master's degree. 

Student Appeal Process
A candidate may informally discuss any complaint about the exam and/or grading procedure with the CECC.  If this discussion does not resolve the student's complaint, the complaint should be submitted in written form to the program director within 10 calendar days following receipt of the written grade from the CECC.  If the student questions the grading of portions of the examination, 1-2 additional faculty members will evaluate the student’s responses.  Faculty member(s) familiar with the course material will be designated as second grader(s) by the Program Director.  The candidate has the right to initiate appeal procedures as described in the TTUHSC School of Health Professions Student Hearing Policy and Procedure.




Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Speech-Language Pathology
Thesis policy

Philosophy
The master’s thesis and doctoral dissertation represent the most scholarly work produced by a graduate student in School of Health Professions. The thesis must demonstrate a mastery of the techniques of research, a thorough understanding of the subject matter and its background, and a high degree of skill in organizing and presenting the materials. The student is expected to complete the work independently under the supervision of an approved thesis committee and within a specified period of time prior to graduation.
Above all, scientific rigor and scholarly performance characterize thesis research. These guiding principles are especially embodied in the oral defense of the thesis. Successful completion indicates, in part, that a student has mastered the information and therefore earned the right to be considered an expert in his or her area of research.

Enrollment

A master’s thesis requires the completion of a minimum of 6 credit hours of research under the direction of a graduate faculty member, typically the chair of the thesis committee. The student will enroll in thesis research courses (e.g., HPSH 6000) for 1-3 hours per semester over four semesters (spring 1, summer 1, fall 2, spring 2). The exact number of hours a student enrolls in each semester is determined via conversation with the student’s thesis chairperson. The student must be enrolled in at least 1 credit hour the semester in which the thesis is defended. In order to register in the appropriate section, students must identify a thesis advisor prior to enrolling in thesis research.


Committee

The master’s thesis committee will consist of three faculty members; exceptions may be made to include up to five committee members if deemed necessary by the student and student’s advisor. The thesis chair must possess an earned doctorate degree. The other committee members may include faculty with a doctorate or master’s degree and may be in the Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences or an alternative department at TTUHSC or TTU. The committee members should be able to support an aspect of the student’s project, including but not limited to research design, data analysis, content expertise, subject recruitment. The student is expected to first identify a chairperson willing to chair the thesis committee and identify a topic (see below). Once these factors have been identified, the student is expected to personally ask each potential committee member of their willingness to serve. The student should present an overview of the intended topic as well as the intended purpose the committee member will fulfill.



Topic
Selection of a topic for thesis research should be influenced primarily by the student’s interests and secondarily by the faculty’s expertise and availability of necessary resources required for eventual completion. The student and advisor are urged to identify a research project that can be completed within 4 semesters and that will be the student’s independent work. Specifically, the research questions should not be provided from an existing project the advisor is conducting. Possible sources of data/methodologies include but aren’t limited to:


  • Case studies (choosing a client in the clinic or in the community)
  • Replication study
  • Chart review
  • Descriptive study
  • Experimental design
Research questions could involve typical or disordered populations of any age. Research questions could also be derived from existing data or existing projects, so long as the question represents a unique/independent focus of the student.


Expectations

The topic and focus of the thesis project is between the student and advisor. However, there are certain expectations for all students choosing to complete a thesis for graduation credit. These expectations are listed below:
  • The thesis will include 5 chapters including an introduction, literature review, methods, results, and discussion.
  • Students will decide to complete a thesis in lieu of comprehensive exams during their first fall semester. All students MUST defend by Spring Break of their final spring semester. See a tentative timeline below.
  • The student must distribute the first 3 chapters (introduction, literature review, methods) 2 weeks prior to the prospectus meeting to each committee member. These chapters must be completed and in final form (see Prospectus Meeting below for  more details).
  • The student may not under any circumstances begin data collection or data analysis prior to the prospectus meeting.
  • The student is expected to schedule regular meetings with each committee member throughout the process.
  • The student must schedule a meeting with the program director once a thesis chair has been selected.


Proposal Meeting

A proposal meeting must be convened before the student proceeds with the thesis/dissertation project. This meeting is to last no longer than 2 hours. For this meeting, the student is expected to present a brief overview of the first three chapters (approximately 20-30 minutes) and then open it up for committee members to comment, question, and suggest changes to support the student’s ultimate success. All thesis/dissertation committee members are obliged to attend and determine if the project as proposed is viable for continuation. Students should be prepared to present the entire committee with the first three chapters of their thesis (i.e., Introduction, Review of Literature, and Methods) two weeks in advance of the scheduled meeting. Evidence of a well-developed rationale, literature review, statement of the hypothesis, and research design will facilitate approval.
Students must not collect any data until their proposed thesis has been approved by the committee.In the event of using human subjects, approval must also be obtained from the TTUHSC Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects (IRB).
At the conclusion of the meeting, the committee will vote as to approval, conditional approval (with conditions specified), or disapproval of the proposed project. This action will constitute an agreement between the student and the committee in regard to further pursuing the proposed research. Committee approval will be documented in writing and signed by all committee members (see Prospectus form). Any substantive changes in study design must be approved by the entire committee in writing.

Oral Defense

The oral defense is a public forum in which the candidate presents his or her area of research and answers questions directed to him or her by the committee members, other professionals, and private citizens. The candidate will be instructed to make a public presentation of the thesis or dissertation research. The presentation should provide a concise review of the salient literature and the hypothesis and rationale. In addition the presentation should describe the subject population, methods and procedures, and overview of the results. Finally, the candidate should make brief comments concerning the implications. Following the public presentation, the candidate will defend his or her thesis in a closed door meeting with the thesis committee. The defense should not exceed 2 hours, although final deliberations by the committee or subsequent discussions with the candidate may take longer. Students should defend their thesis before the deadline of the semester that she or he intends to graduate.
Once the examination period has been completed, the committee chair will ask the candidate to be excused while the committee reviews the candidate’s performance. After all due deliberations have concluded, the chair will call for a vote from the committee in regards to passing, passing with revisions (as specified in writing by the committee), or failing. A majority vote will be used in reaching a decision. The chair will record the votes for possible future reference. The candidate will then be invited back into the room and given the decision of the committee. Revisions, if warranted, will also be explained at that time.
The room number, date, and time of the thesis defense must be approved two weeks in advance, and public notices must be posted. Copies of the thesis must be distributed to each committee member two weeks prior to the defense.
In the event that a student does not successfully defend his or her thesis and the scope of the problem exceeds what would typically be required in a major revision, the committee may fail the student. In the event of failure, the student may follow the remediation guidelines set by his or her respective academic program.


Format and style

The thesis must be written in a clear and grammatically correct manner. The final format must conform to the standards of the respective department within the School of Health Professions and the TTU Graduate School (https://hscweb.ttuhsc.edu/health-professions/documents/current/Thesis_and_Dissertation_Policy-2016.pdf). All theses must follow the guidelines specified in the current Graduate School Thesis-Dissertation Formatting Guidelines
The student must schedule a meeting with Michelle Broselow in the Dean’s office (
 michelle.broselow@ttuhsc.edu) prior to beginning writing any chapters to discuss proper formatting. Once the final defense has been approved, and any recommended edits are complete, students must again contact Michelle Broselow to submit the final document.


Grading

Each enrollment in thesis will be graded on a Pass/Fail basis.


Tentative Timeline

1st Fall Semester:
  • Choose to complete a thesis
  • Identify a thesis chair
  • Begin exploring possible topics
  • By early November, register for at least 1 hour of thesis course for spring


Over Winter Break:
  • Read several research articles to further identify possible topics/gaps in the literature


1st Spring Semester:
  • Identify a topic and research questions/aims
  • Identify possible committee members
  • Schedule meetings with each committee member
  • Finalize research questions
  • Schedule a meeting with Michelle Broselow to establish proper formatting for chapters
  • Write introduction, literature review, and methods
  • Register for 1-3 hours of thesis course for summer


Summer Semester:
  • Schedule Prospectus Meeting
  • Complete IRB paperwork, if applicable
  • Register for 1-3 hours of thesis course for fall


2nd Fall Semester:
  • Begin data collection (if applicable)
  • Complete data analyses
  • Write the Results chapter
  • Begin writing the Discussion chapter
  • Register for 1-3 hours of thesis course for summer

2nd Spring Semester:
  • Finalize Results and Discussion chapter
  • Create any necessary tables, figures, appendices
  • Schedule and complete Oral defense before spring break
  • Schedule meeting with Michelle Broselow
  • Submit final document to ETD (Electronic Theses and Dissertaions)


Reference:  SHP OP: ST. 18  Thesis and Dissertation



Thesis Committee Selection Form

Date:


Student’s Full Legal Name:                                                    R#:


Thesis committee must include a minimum of three members, not to exceed five members including the chair.


By signing, I agree to be an active member on _________________________’s committee through completion of the oral defense. 


Signatures


Graduate Student

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature

Committee Chairperson

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________


Signature



Prospectus

Date:


Student’s Full Legal Name:                                                                R#:


Title of Thesis: _______________________________________


By signing, I agree that ____________________ has successfully defended the first three chapters (introduction, literature review, methods) and is approved to begin data collection and analysis.


Signatures


Graduate Student

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature


Committee Chairperson

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature


Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature


Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature


Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature


Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature







Oral Defense

Date:


Student’s Full Legal Name:                                                                R#:


Title of Thesis: _______________________________________


By signing, I agree that ___________________ has successfully defended his/her thesis and has made all edits as requested by the committee.


Signatures


Graduate Student

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature

Committee Chairperson

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature

Committee Member

____________________________________

Print Name

____________________________________

Signature






Completion of Degree Requirements Form   
          

  • Thesis
  •  Prospectus
  • Oral defense

                        Title:      



Signatures



________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Graduate Student                                    Date                                   Committee Chairperson                     Date


________________________________________  

Committee Member                           Date                   



  

________________________________________  

Committee Member                           Date                     


________________________________________  

Committee Member                           Date                     




*The following signatures are ONLY required for the Thesis Oral Defense:



 

_________________________________________

*Department Chair                               Date                    



___________________________________________________

*Dean of the School of Health Professions       Date






Speech-Language Pathology Flowcharts


Academic Probation Flowchart



SLP Academic/Clinical Course Concerns Flowchart


SLP Comprehensive Examinations Flowchart



SLP KASA Learning Outcomes Flowchart